The Evolution of Perceived Value

Just imagine yourself standing in the heart of a bustling urban market place. You see a street vendor hold up a simple stone. He begins to scream at the top of his lungs of this stone’s miraculous properties and unrivaled beauty. You watch a crowd gather, each person assigning value to that stone based on its perceived rarity, the vendor's pitch, or simply because others seem interested. This scenario, reminiscent of ancient bazaars, is not far off from today's digital age, where items like NFTs or trends like Birkenstock sandals captivate the masses. The question then arises: how do we truly measure the value of something when its worth is so deeply intertwined with collective opinion?

For centuries, philosophers and thinkers have pondered over the concept of value. Reflecting on ancient civilizations, such as the Mesopotamians and Egyptians, the value of an item was often based on its utility, rarity, and the effort put into its creation (Walsh).

However, as societies expanded and evolved, the perception and interpretation of value transformed. By the Renaissance, the mere material or functional worth of an item became intertwined with its artistic and cultural significance (Zucker). Consider a painting from this era; its value was no longer determined by the quality of materials or the intricacy of its design but also by the artist's reputation and the societal contexts it resonated with (Zucker).

Then came the Industrial Revolution, a period of mass production, democratizing access to goods. This surge in factory-made items, while abundant and accessible, led to a renewed appreciation for artisanal, unique, and handcrafted treasures and prompted society to reevaluate what it deemed valuable (Rafferty).

Transitioning to the 20th and 21st centuries, the determinants of value became an intricate web of cultural, societal, and increasingly, digital influences. This complexity mirrors the bustling marketplace described in the introduction, where perceptions fluctuate rapidly, often led by social media and marketing strategies. In this digital age, influencers and advertisers do not just sell products; they architect our desires, directing our gaze towards what we should cherish and how we should evaluate its significance (Jagani et al.). Amidst this ever-evolving scene, today's treasures risk becoming tomorrow's relics.

Take, for instance, the diamond. Its shimmer and durability are undeniably captivating, yet the reasons behind its high valuation remain uncertain. Nicky Oppenheimer of De Beers, South African-based diamond industry leader, claims that once “stripped of societal layers, a diamond is but elegantly stacked carbon” (Cowell). So, the true brilliance of the diamond industry is not just in the gems they offer, but in the masterful orchestration of value perception. The timeless "a diamond is forever" campaign perfectly depicts the diamond's supposed rarity with the symbol of eternal love (Friedman). The media and entertainment industry completely transformed the diamond from a luxury stone to a symbol of commitment.

As our lens widens to the digital age, platforms like TikTok, Twitter, and Instagram where influencers serve as modern-day trendsetters. Their reach is vast and their impact evident. With a single post or video, they have the potential to shape the buying behaviors of millions (Loeb). This goes beyond mere recommendations; it's about shaping perceptions, creating desires, and in some cases, even crafting a sense of identity for their followers (Kim and Kim).

Consider the rise and fall of specific fashion items like Birkenstock sandals or Adidas Sambas. Their sudden resurgence in popularity isn’t rooted in their inherent quality or timeless design. Instead, their appeal is constructed, amplified by influencers and celebrities who frame these items as 'must-haves' (Loeb). Once endorsed, followers rush to get them, hoping to mimic the style, status, or aura of the influencers they admire (Influencity).

However, the lifespan of such trends is often alarmingly short. As quickly as they come into vogue, they fall out of favor, especially when influencers pivot to the next 'big thing'. A specific example is the "Fidget Spinner" trend. According to a report by the New York Times, after reaching peak popularity in 2017 due to influencer endorsements, the fidget spinner's sales plummeted when these endorsements dwindled (Duhigg).

This trend extends beyond the realms of fashion or transient gadgets, influencing various facets of our contemporary life. Take, for instance, the cryptic world of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs). These digital assets are reshaping our understanding of value. Traditional patterns that associate worth with rarity or tangible labor are being overturned. While gold has always been valued, not for its metallic attributes but by a societal agreement of its worth, NFTs push this idea to its digital extreme. Digital art, capable of being replicated endlessly, can command prices that rival or even exceed those of tangible art (Erskine). While source and authenticity are essential foundations, it is undeniable that speculative desire, driven by the masses, often inflates these valuations. Thus, the world of NFTs becomes a digital reflection of how value can be as volatile as the inconsistent opinions of the online masses (Erskine).

Dietary approaches like Keto and exercise routines such as HIIT, though grounded in health advantages, often get inflated beyond their foundational principles by media depictions. Amplified by pervasive advertising, personal recommendations, and fitness center campaigns, these practices are portrayed as magic solutions for attaining the ideal body and lifestyle. These polished stories frequently overlook the dedication and effort involved, showcasing success tales as standard results (Clark). A case in point is the promotion of keto pills on "Shark Tank" (Krstic). Such promotions, rather than focusing on genuine health gains, exploit the appeal of instant solutions and popular fads. The ubiquity of social media heightens these narratives, inducing a domino effect where people, motivated by the anxiety of missing out, hurry to embrace the latest health trend, prioritizing societal approval over true well-being (Clark). As these trends come and go, replaced by the next 'revolutionary' regimen or product, it prompts us to question: Are we seeking these health solutions out of genuine belief in their efficacy, or are we simply riding the waves of societal trends? The passing nature of these trends highlights our society's shifting values, prompting us to reconsider the genuineness of our decisions amidst prevalent social conformity.

In today's dynamic digital landscape, prevailing trends frequently influence us. This influence extends beyond mere purchasing habits, indicating a profound shift in societal perspectives. Given that our understanding of value seems to be continually evolving in response to societal trends, we are urged to reflect on our decisions, understand the motivations driving them, and recognize the external factors that mold them.

Recent research indicates an accelerated change in our consumption habits. A notable indication of our ever-changing preferences is the diminishing human attention span, which has decreased from 12 seconds in 2000 to just 8 seconds in recent times (Egan). This shortened attention span isn't just a data point; it mirrors our society's trend towards fleeting satisfactions. As we seamlessly transition from one content to another and one trend to the next, it prompts us to ponder the depth of our interactions. If our attention is so ephemeral, can our admiration and assessment of things be sincere and profound? The swift alterations in values and consumption habits urge introspection on our core reasons: in this fast-paced digital era, why do we, as conscious entities, place deep importance on certain things or beliefs? It suggests the disconcerting idea that our value assessments might be more influenced by transient societal trends and momentary digital validations than by inherent worth.

Navigating the online realm, I am constantly amazed at how each interaction, be it a TikTok scroll or a Twitter post, appears to redefine our sense of value. This ongoing metamorphosis evokes introspection: in today's age, is there anything that retains a steadfast value? The further we immerse ourselves in this interconnected realm, the more intangible the true nature of value seems to become. While we cherish cultural landmarks, such as timeless art and literature, we must wonder: is their value inherent, or merely a mirror of the prevailing societal views? In the vein of Plato's cave allegory, we're prompted to reflect on whether our views are merely silhouettes of a deeper, lasting truth beneath (Minott).

Realizing the ever-changing nature of our values is an enlightening experience. This realization not only spurs deeper self-awareness but also inspires us to move beyond the confines of mainstream views. In this perpetually changing setting, the undying search for truth and the prowess to adapt are essential. It might very well be our responsibility to discern real significance, unhindered by societal influences.

While this journey presents its unique existential hurdles, it is also deeply fulfilling. It offers a chance to navigate the world's nuances, steering us towards true insight rather than just aligning with temporary societal standards.

Works Cited

Clark, Nancy. “Social Media and Body Image: #Fitspiration at Its Worst.” Blog.afaa.com, blog.afaa.com/social-media-and-body-image.

Cowell, Alan. “Controversy over Diamonds Made into Virtue by de Beers.” The New York Times, 22 Aug. 2000, www.nytimes.com/2000/08/22/business/controversy-over-diamonds-made-into-virtue-by-de-beers.html.

Dr. Steven Zucker. “What Made Art Valuable: Then and Now – Smarthistory.” Smarthistory.org, 2015, smarthistory.org/what-made-art-valuable-then-and-now/.

Duhigg, Charles. “The Rise of the Fidget Spinner and the Fall of the Well-Managed Fad.” The New York Times, 15 Aug. 2017, www.nytimes.com/2017/08/15/magazine/the-rise-of-the-fidget-spinner-and-the-fall-of-the-well-managed-fad.html.

Erskine, Matthew. “Uncertainty in the Valuation of Non-Fungible Tokens.” Forbes, www.forbes.com/sites/matthewerskine/2022/02/02/uncertainty-in-the-valuation-of-non-fungible-tokens/?sh=58a5dd3d6ddd. Accessed 26 Oct. 2023.

Influencity. “The Impact of Influencer Marketing on Consumer Behavior and Purchase Decisions.” Influencity.com, 14 Apr. 2023, influencity.com/blog/en/the-impact-of-influencer-marketing-on-consumer-behavior-and-purchase-decisions.

Joshi, Yatish, et al. “Social Media Influencer Marketing: Foundations, Trends, and Ways Forward.” Electronic Commerce Research, 25 June 2023, link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10660-023-09719-z, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-023-09719-z.

Kim, Jihye, and Minseong Kim. “Rise of Social Media Influencers as a New Marketing Channel: Focusing on the Roles of Psychological Well-Being and Perceived Social Responsibility among Consumers.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 19, no. 4, 18 Feb. 2022. NCBI, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8872418/, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042362.

Krstic, Zee. “The Truth about Those “Shark Tank” Keto Pill Advertisements You Keep Seeing.” Https://Finance.yahoo.com/News/Truth-Those-Shark-Tank-Keto-233000483.Html?Guccounter=1&Guce_referrer=AHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&Guce_referrer_sig=AQAAALNpaAlKgyDTU2RTBlx8kO8A6cELOAiGd7EgGG0Xc8hgyOOMO8btaFgog5ZNpccZJslKNteaYVRA88Zp5gHpUm1bdNVPCjAAbCIDFwmKR2n8moB5trf_ArAlWVr-M9G2PGRb1s5mVmM6eCl_doTro3p65QyjThgHN7BWUu5NIlR, Yahoo!Finance, 16 Oct. 2020.

Loeb, Walter. “Influencer Impact on Consumers Increasing – Facebook Has Less Power.” Forbes, 3 Feb. 2022, www.forbes.com/sites/walterloeb/2022/02/03/influencer-impact-on-consumers-increasing--facebook-has-less-power/.

Rafferty, John. “The Rise of the Machines: Pros and Cons of the Industrial Revolution | Britannica.” Www.britannica.com, www.britannica.com/story/the-rise-of-the-machines-pros-and-cons-of-the-industrial-revolution#:~:text=Library%20of%20Congress%2C%20Washington%2C%20D. Accessed 26 Oct. 2023.

Uri Friedman. “How an Ad Campaign Invented the Diamond Engagement Ring.” The Atlantic, The Atlantic, 13 Feb. 2015, www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/02/how-an-ad-campaign-invented-the-diamond-engagement-ring/385376/.

Walsh, Justin St. P. “Book Review of the Construction of Value in the Ancient World, Edited by John K. Papadopoulos and Gary Urton.” American Journal of Archaeology, vol. 119, no. 4, Oct. 2015, https://doi.org/10.3764/ajaonline1194.walsh.

‌